News 
 State News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 Herd and flock numbers fall 

Herd and flock numbers fall

24 Nov, 2008 05:59 PM
Australia’s cattle and sheep numbers declined throughout the 2007-08 fiscal year, as drought continued to ravage southern Australia.

Meat and Livestock Australia is reporting that the latest figures from the Australian Bureau of Statistics show Australia’s cattle herd for the year ending 30 June 2008 declined 0.8pc to 27.8 million head.

The sheep flock dropped 7.6pc to 79.2 million head, the lowest national flock since 1920.

MLA says the sharp decline in the Australian sheep flock for 2007-08 was largely expected, given the unrelenting impact of drought conditions across key sheep producing regions of NSW, Victoria and SA.

The shift away from sheep to cropping in WA contributed to the flock in the west plunging 13pc year-on-year to 18.4 million head – down 52pc from the peak of 38.4 million head in 1990, and the lowest level since 1962.

Surprisingly, Victoria was the only state to record an increase in flock numbers for the year, up 2pc to 17.5 million head, while NSW (26.8 million head) and SA (10.2 million head) recorded falls of 6pc and 12pc, respectively.

Despite the decline in total flock numbers over the past year, breeding ewe numbers rose 0.4pc on the previous year to 46.6 million head.

The maintenance of breeding ewe numbers indicates a willingness to rebuild sheep numbers, if and when seasonal conditions permit.

In contrast to the sheep flock, the national cattle herd remained relatively stable throughout 2007-08, as the 4pc growth in Queensland (12.2 million head) almost offset falls across the remaining states.

In NSW, herd numbers declined 1.9pc to 5.8 million head, as falls across drought affected southern regions offset growth in the north.

In Victoria, herd numbers dropped 8pc year-on-year, to 3.9 million head, the lowest level in 15 years.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
With our drought and climate change it is good that we actually have less livestock. They are the cause of much of our land degregation and greenhouse gas emissions, and water consumption.
Posted by vegan , 24/11/2008 8:06:20 PM
I am sure the land in your concrete jungle is degraded vegan. The water i catch in my dams stays fresh and there is too much rain just now in my green sth west corner.
Posted by THE FARMER, 25/11/2008 4:52:03 PM
Good---Less farm animals -- hopefully could mean less farm animal cruelty.
Posted by olivia , 28/11/2008 12:36:26 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
21 November, 2008
20 November, 2008
21 November, 2008
24 November, 2008
21 November, 2008
POLL
Q: Do you believe the new board of Australian Wool Innovation can heal the rifts within the industry?

Yes
(26.9%)

No
(56.6%)

Undecided
(16.4%)

Total Votes: 438
Poll Date: 24 November, 2008

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
Subscriptions
 
Grower
 
Rural Bookshop
 
SJ Facebook
 
SJ Twitter


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...