News 
 State News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 More SA growers demand GM choice 

More SA growers demand GM choice

17/11/2008 11:16:00 AM
SUPPORT for genetically modified crops appears to be slowly growing among the State's farmers, but there remains strong consumer resistance to the technology.

This is the message from a recent Rural Press Marketing Survey, undertaken exclusively for the Stock Journal, which asked for the views of farmers and consumers.

More than 60 per cent of the farmers surveyed said they believed having access to GM crops would offer economic benefits – a 12pc rise on a Stock Journal poll in February.

And there was an 18pc jump in farmers who believed GM crops would offer agronomic benefits, with 66pc believing this to be the case. The greatest benefits were believed to be increased yields, drought tolerance and reduced chemical use.

Despite many farmers believing there would be benefits to be gained from accessing these crops, only 45pc supported the State Government's ban on GM crops being lifted, and 46pc said they would grow the crops if given the choice. Of the consumers questioned as part of the survey, 93pc believed GM foods needed to be labeled as such, saying this would offer freedom of choice.

Only 34pc of consumers said they would be happy to eat food made from GM grain. More than 50pc believed GM foods posed health-risk concerns. And 80pc believed they were already consuming GM foods without knowing.

* Extract from a full report in Stock Journal, November 13 issue.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I find it interesting that 66% of farmers surveyed believe the greatest benefit for GM crops is increased yields, drought tolerance and reduced chemical use when this is not true of GM canola. The GM bit of GM canola is only resistance to glyphosate, not increased yields, drought tolerance or reduced chemical use.
Posted by Julie Newman on 17/11/2008 12:03:43 PM
Unbelievable. What are these farmers basing their choice on? The Monsanto-driven hysteria that has been created in Victoria and NSW with the growing of GM canola by a tiny minority of farmers, the results of which we are yet to discover, and it's likely a lot of it will be turned to hay anyway, or the fact that a pro-GM fledgling WA state government has also fallen hook, line and sinker for the myths that GM crops will make them rich? Look at the facts guys! Canadian farmers are getting fewer, farms are getting larger and subsidies are all that are keeping them solvent! The only ones making a profit are the Biotech companies.
Posted by Hebe on 17/11/2008 4:36:06 PM
Doesn't there have to be some distinction between GM technology that takes genes from a particularly resistant or high yielding strain and introduces them within the same species, to GM technology which introduces 'foreign' genes (from other species) and/or resistance to chemicals (such as roundup ready canola)? WHERE is the evidence that 'foreign' GM technology will improve yields in the long term? Anything that is roundup ready evidently has a downside - that of becoming a pest plant.
Posted by Cath Stokes on 18/11/2008 8:11:19 AM
No wonder less than half of farmers (46%) would grow GM crops if given a choice. Most farmers hear the deafening cry of consumers (93%) who want labelling meaning they will avoid GM products like the plague. It's a brave farmer indeed who would risk his future on one of the world's most contentious and polarising technologies. It's simple business logic - give your customers what they want, and customers don't want GM food!
Posted by Greg Revell on 18/11/2008 10:52:27 AM
I fail to see how farmers can see GM crops as an economic benefit when consumers do NOT want to buy it and are trying desparately to avoid it! Helen Russell - SA Farmer
Posted by Helen Russell on 19/11/2008 2:58:18 PM
Very simply put, this means Monsanto's propaganda is working! The other obvious conclusion is that few farmers have done any indepth research on GM Canola. As for those who believe that the GM canola will be more drought resistant, I suggest that they contact Allan Chartres who was Chief Scientist for the National Water Commission who has studied GM canola crops for twenty five years says without equivocation that GM canola is NOT drought resistant NOR salt tolerant. Now, dear farmer, if you believe that you know better than a scientist of Allans stature--- go right ahead!!!
Posted by Creeker on 20/11/2008 2:26:11 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
KAPUNDA farmer Leon Hampel
KAPUNDA farmer Leon Hampel

RELATED ARTICLES

MOST POPULAR

01 Jul 09 | The ridiculous ironies and double standards of both politicians and the media were on show for all to see with the ‘utegate’ scandal, online editor Michael Thomson writes, but he says no-one is the better for it.
Ray White Rural
 
Subscription
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
FOL Email Promo


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...