News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Lower Lakes flooding decision on hold 

Lower Lakes flooding decision on hold

13 Jan, 2009 03:01 PM
Permission to flood the Lower Lakes with sea water will not be granted to the South Australian Government for at least another three months - if at all.

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett has imposed a ‘controlled action’ order on the proposal, demanding the SA Government prepare an Environmental Impact Statement under the Federal Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act.

This means addressing the impact salt water would have on the wetlands’ ecology and on threatened and migratory species, as well as the likely investigation of alternative solutions, such as bio-remediation, that do not require flooding the lakes.

Ashville dairy farmer Clem Mason said he welcomed the announcement by Mr Garrett.

"We are confident that with his understanding of environmental issues that he will see that sea water is an impending disaster that he will not want to sign his name to," he said.

"If salt water gets into Lake Albert it would be irreversible and you’ll get something worse at the southern end of the Coorong.

"It will be dead and an ecological disaster."

Federal Environment Minister Peter Garrett said the EIS would be subject to a "full and rigorous" assessment.

"The South Australian Government’s proposal ... is to be a matter of comprehensive environmental assessment under the relevant Commonwealth legislation and there will be sufficient opportunity for the public to comment on that proposal and any likely decision is still some way down the track," he said.

But Federal Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the announ-cement was "another nail in the coffin for SA’s Lower Lakes".

"With no announcement of a commitment to finding a non-saltwater option, it seems the Government is simply flying the white flag, and doing little to nothing to avoid what they admit is the worst case scenario," she said.

"Our Lower Lakes must remain fresh."

Making a rare statement on the issue, South Australian Premier Mike Rann reiterated that letting salt water into the Lower Lakes was a last resort measure.

"The Government will leave no stone unturned in investigating all other possible options - such as bio-remediation of affected areas and the use of lime - to protect the lakes from acidification," he said.

"The last thing the Government wants to do is flood the lower lakes with sea water."

There will be a public comment period of 20 business days once the EIS is released.

The EIS will then be updated and Environment Minister Peter Garrett will have 40 days to make a final decision.

The full process is expected to take about three months.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I wonder who who termed the word "flooding", the lakes, this sounds as though we are going to have another 1956 Murray flood, how inappropriate. The Environmental Impact study is two and half years late and we are still waiting for results?
Posted by Angas B, 14/01/2009 2:37:49 PM
How can returning an environment to its natural state be termed a disaster? Can somebody please explain?
Posted by Dick, 14/01/2009 8:17:42 PM
I agree Dick. I find it bizzare that it has taken so long to to not come to a decision. Over millions of years there would have been times when long-term droughts have occured. The Murray would have been a series of puddles (well according to my grandfather it actually was at times). And of course as gravity cannot be defied, in those times, sea water would have been present in the lakes. I fail to see what is so hard to understand about this. Some say it would be a environmental disaster if sea water was allowed back in (i.e naturally) I would love to know on what basis this con be said without evidence and against common simple physics.
Posted by Ngarkat, 18/01/2009 8:11:29 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Dried up: Ashville dairy farmer Clem Mason at his land adjacent to Lake Albert, welcomes a Federal Government decision to scrutinise the environmental impact of flooding the Lower Lakes with saltwater prior to any decision being made.
Dried up: Ashville dairy farmer Clem Mason at his land adjacent to Lake Albert, welcomes a Federal Government decision to scrutinise the environmental impact of flooding the Lower Lakes with saltwater prior to any decision being made.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Are you satisfied with how your industry body is spending your producer levies?

Yes
(16.7%)

No
(74%)

Undecided
(9.3%)

Total Votes: 365
Poll Date: 12 January, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock Journal







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...