News 
 State News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Concern over drain responses 

Concern over drain responses

21 Mar, 2009 03:00 AM
A CATCHMENT group sceptical about Department of Water, Land and Bio­diversity reasons for commission a review and survey of projects integral to completing the Upper South East Dryland Salinity and Flood Management Program says understanding of specifics in the broader community "will almost certainly be very poor".

While DWLBC next month hopes to release its findings to assess risks and community perceptions of the drainage package, the catchment group says every additional delay increases the difficulty and cost of completing the $72 million project before the December deadline.

"An overriding concern ... is that the process of review and surveys is dragging on and on, and is already months past the original completion date," spokesman for the Bald Hill/Wimpinmerit Catchment Group Peter England, Blackford Merinos, said.

"The timeline for the ecological review ... has already blown out from the projected one month to more than four months. Even once this report is delivered, there will be further delays while the project team responds and while the Parliamentary Natural Resources Committee considers the report to finalise their recommendations to the Minister."

Program leader of the USEDSFMP Jane Hosking said there were two components of the scheme scheduled for construction this year – the Bald Hill/Wimpinmerit Drain and the REFLOWS (restoring environmental flows to the Upper SE) project. They were being reviewed to assist her board "in its assessment of the two projects".

International services company GDH is conducting an independent review of the risks and benefits to the environmental values of the West Avenue Watercourse associated with the project.

"This scientific review will consider existing scientific evidence, including the extensive ecological, hydrological and soils data available," Ms Hosking said.

"As part of the process, GHD is speaking with key agencies and scientific experts, and will review environmental risks and benefits of the Bald Hill drain as part of the broader program.

"In parallel to this ... the Ehrenberg-Bass Institute at the University of South Australia is conducting an independent assessment of community perspectives on the proposed constructions.

"This survey is endeavouring to find out the level of understanding and support there is for the Upper SE drainage program, with a focus on the REFLOWS and the Bald Hill drain."

* Extract from a full report in Stock Journal, March 19 issue.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I am appalled that a landowner would write a comment in the Stock Journal suggesting that understanding the specifics (of yet another deep drain) in the broader community "will almost certainly be very poor" - that is a very arrogant and ill informed comment. Most of us have lived with the side effects of deep drainage for more than a decade now, and will understand the dreadful legacy of them. Bare landscapes, no wonderful swamps, and loss of biodiversity. They will also see large areas of land now becoming desert like. We must stop this dreadful practice now.
Posted by Jerry, 29/03/2009 9:27:36 PM
Don't drain rain, let's keep it in the landscape. The SE needs more rain and more water to maintain the health of the environment and help keep our biodivesity intact.
Posted by Wally, 30/03/2009 3:16:54 PM
It is scarcely believable that in these times when environmental calamities seem on the increase, when nature seems to be rebelling against man's interference and fighting back with more frequent floods, fires, cyclones and droughts, we would be contemplating the construction of hundreds of kilometres of drains which will kill native vegetation, destroy soil structure, contaminate downstream environments and sign the death warrant for the last remaining pristine wetlands in the Upper South East.
Posted by Bill, 31/03/2009 9:27:09 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
KEILIRA farmers David Rasheed and Alex Ratcliff (pictured at the Fairview Drain diversion site) say they cannot see why anyone is against the final two drains of the Upper South East scheme – the Bald Hill/Wimpinmerit drains.
KEILIRA farmers David Rasheed and Alex Ratcliff (pictured at the Fairview Drain diversion site) say they cannot see why anyone is against the final two drains of the Upper South East scheme – the Bald Hill/Wimpinmerit drains.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES

Most popular articles

Advertisement



Stock Journal







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...