News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Stand by your sheep, growers urged 

Stand by your sheep, growers urged

19/05/2008 3:10:00 PM
Wool producers across Western Australia have rejected a mulesing peace deal proposed by radical animal activists.

The deal would have required nationwide adoption of bare-breech breeding programs and the immediate dismissal of Australia Wool Innovation's $7 million clips.

Under the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animal's (PETA) three-point offer, Australian farmers would need to immediately abandon clip mulesing, ensure no clip or surgical mulesing took place after the 2010 deadline and start bare-breech programs with the aim of all wool sheep having naked bottoms by the end of 2013.

In return, PETA said it would walk away from the issue and stop harassing retailers.

But WA producers were sceptical of the deal.

Even if PETA could be trusted, what it was asking was difficult, if not impossible, for some types of wool producing sheep across the country.

Most of the damage PETA could have caused had probably already been done, breeders said.

WAFarmers wool section president, Max Watts, said trying to deal with radical animal rights groups such as PETA just did not work.

"You cannot trust them as far as you can kick them," Mr Watts said.

"One minute they are supporting the use of the clips, the next minute they change their minds.

"In the past they have broken their word while we have kept ours."

Mr Watts said farmers continued to do everything they could to phase out the practice by 2010.

"It is time PETA took a reasonable stance," Mr Watts said.

"It might be possible for some flocks to get to bare breech quickly but others may never get there.

"If they think this is all going to happen overnight they are living in fairy land."

Shahs Merino stud principal Peter Ralston, Tammin, said he would be asking if PETA was really going to stick by its end of the bargain and stop harassing international retailers; otherwise its deal would mean nothing.

"In any case, what they are asking us to do is not possible on a nationwide scale given the timeframe," Mr Ralston said.

"While it is possible to breed for certain characteristics quickly, producers would have to sacrifice other traits, which have been their focus for many years, in order to do so.

"To breed a national bare breech flock by 2013, while maintaining the quality Merino sheep we currently have in this country, would be impossible."

Mr Ralston has spent the past 15 years breeding plainer sheep which had eliminated the incidence of body strike and helped create an easier care animal.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Attn. AWI; Do not negotiate any deal on my behalf with any animal rights group.

I do not make deals with non consumers and non stakeholders.

Neither should my representitive body, which spends my money for its funding.

Peta and it's supporters do not consume wool, or any other animal product.

Why try to appease these losers?

Or do we have a board made up of "peace in our time" Chamberlains?

Posted by Brindi on 19/05/2008 7:06:48 PM
Many cattlemen have chosen black over red to beat cancer eye because stud breeders ignored this heritable disease for other traits.

Merino stud stalwarts need to take heed or they too will lose support from commercial clients who may even chose non-wool sheep.

It would be a shame to lose one of our national icons.

I for one would like to see a modified adapted Merino and I am sure improved fertility, fitness and carcasse traits could compensate for wool losses.

Posted by common cents on 20/05/2008 8:39:10 AM
Hi "common cents", how much wool do you think is being lost from the breech of our current flock ?
Posted by Billy on 20/05/2008 9:50:39 AM
PETA, PETA vege eater, had a sheep but couldn't keep her, seems she had a woolly butt, with dags and grubs and lots of muck, but what could poor young PETA do, no clips, no cuts and lots of poo, the poor old sheep was comdemned it seems, to a life of grubs for PETA's dreams, and presenting to the worldly spinners an earth devoid of sheep and roast lamb dinners.
Posted by Jaffa on 20/05/2008 2:23:33 PM
The observation that PETA has caused as much damage as it is likely to cause to the wool industry is absolutely correct. Ask this question: have wool exports and and domestic wool use shown any measurable ill effects since this truly fringe dwelling outfit opened its anti-mulesing campaign all that time ago? Take into account the natural and objectively measurable movements in wool usage and the answer comes out as a resounding 'no'. Wool is a high demand commodity, and although some end users make bows and scrapes toward PETA, that demand will continue without or without mulesing being employed as a tool to assist in meeting that demand.
Posted by Michael Mcgrath on 20/05/2008 2:56:11 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

10:41 AM ACST | Wool's ugly politics, seen at it's worst in recent months, will not change with new faces at Australian Wool Innovation; the problem is deeply rooted in the very structure of the body.
Subscription
 
Media-Kit-08-09
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Agrimaster
 
Rural Bookshop
 
RASF
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...