News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 New wool boss: we have not delivered and must change 

New wool boss: we have not delivered and must change

6/08/2008 5:44:00 PM
Wool's chief body has not handled mulesing well, research developments have not been fast enough and accountability within the company has not been good enough.

Those three startling admissions came from Australian Wool Innovation chair Brian van Rooyen this week, who said he has heard the message that his company has not delivered.

Speaking to a small gathering of growers at Sheepvention in Hamilton, Victoria, Mr van Rooyen promised the culture of his organisation had to change under his command, starting with accountability.

"We are aiming to lift wool demand by 20 to 30 million kilograms from today," he said.

"We need to have an influence on wool price and our new business to business structure and marketing focus will do this."

Next week AWI will relaunch the famous interwoven Woolmark and over the next three years will spend $120 million promoting 'Merino' through variations of the logo and a tiered marketing structure.

While each woolgrower has a different idea of what is a sustainable wool price, Mr van Rooyen says the eastern market indicator (EMI) needs to be at least between 1000 and 1100 cents for woolgrowers to be receiving a decent return.

* Extract from a full report in selected Rural Press weekly agricultural newspapers.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Thanks at last for some intelligent comment from the top. Why it took so long is still a worry.

AWI can't determine the price, but publishing these figures is a very helpful guide for the trade, both for growers and traders.

Now resources must be directed to promotion to achieve these prices so that we can have a viable trade. Only then can growers and traders have the confidence needed to carry on.

There was never any problem with wool the product. The unique physical characteristics which made wool so readily marketable twenty years ago are still the same unique physical characteristics, even more marketable today than they were then.

All of the problems were in the management of the marketing, and they just about wiped out this that was Australia's biggest industry.

In any democracy other than Australia a debacle such as this would have seen the government thrown out at the earliest opportunity. Here in Australia the government did it and nobody noticed.

Posted by Ted O'Brien on 7/08/2008 6:13:32 AM
Mr van Rooyen is already out of touch when he considers 1000 to 1100 cents a decent return, maybe he should get out in the field and find out what it costs to produce wool and what is required for a wool grower to enjoy a reasonable lifestyle.
Posted by jerangle on 7/08/2008 7:01:58 AM
Nice cop out, blame the CEO and the staff - Did the Chairman forget he has been a senior member of the Board for five years and he and they, should fall on thier swords and accept accountability - not blame the indians. His predecesor ruled with an iron fist and should be castigated for the truth having taken so long to emerge from his acoloyte!
Posted by sideliner on 7/08/2008 7:50:56 AM
Brian van Rooyan has been in charge of AWI for nearly six years, now he admits that AWI has not delivered? We have lost 35 million sheep during his time, that is over 25% reduction in the national flock. Woolgrowers cannot afford this hopeless leadership, & must continue the change at November's AWI Board election.
Posted by Martin Oppenheimer on 7/08/2008 8:20:08 AM
Smart move, by admitting performance is well short of the mark deflects criticism.

Mr van Rooyan has been involved at a very senior level in AWI for years so what confidence can growers have in his ability.

Posted by woolly on 7/08/2008 8:30:08 AM
Oh no. Here we go again. The AWGA fleas are biting. Funny how they blame this guy but not their mates on the AWI Board - Wal and Chick. People might get the impression there is an election not too far away!
Posted by AWGA Alert! on 7/08/2008 10:48:26 AM
Thanks for the mention AWGA alert! But we are not the parasites who live off wool industry levies & allow it to decline.

Do you really think that after "not delivering" for woolgrowers, Brian & Co should have another chance?

Posted by Martin Oppenheimer on 7/08/2008 12:46:43 PM
Wool politics! It's been around since federation.

Mr van Rooyen at least comes up with the word accountability.

Thats been missing from the vocabulary within the AWI Board meetings.

Posted by angasb on 7/08/2008 1:59:54 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Who is your preferred Leader of the Federal Opposition?

Brendan Nelson
(8%)

Malcolm Turnbull
(22.4%)

Peter Costello
(49.3%)

Julie Bishop
(9.8%)

Other
(10.5%)

Total Votes: 813
Poll Date: 3/08/2008

10:41 AM ACST | Wool's ugly politics, seen at it's worst in recent months, will not change with new faces at Australian Wool Innovation; the problem is deeply rooted in the very structure of the body.
Subscription
 
Media-Kit-08-09
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Agrimaster
 
Rural Bookshop
 
RASF
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...