News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Hugo Boss misled by PETA on mulesing clips: Wool Taskforce 

Hugo Boss misled by PETA on mulesing clips: Wool Taskforce

21/04/2008 9:42:00 AM
The Australian Wool and Sheep Industry Taskforce claims Hugo Boss has been misled by PETA, which claims that using mulesing clips is cruel to sheep.

International retailer Hugo Boss last week said it would cease to buy wool from mulesed sheep, causing a fresh stir within the industry.

But the Australian Wool and Sheep Industry Taskforce says it welcomes Hugo Boss's support for the phase out of mulesing by the end of 2010, arguing the company's position is "entirely consistent with the industry position taken in 2004 to phase out mulesing by 2010 which we will confidently do".

However, the Taskforce has again hit out at extremist animal rights group PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals), saying it is "peddling misinformation to retailers about the Australian wool industry's alternative flystrike prevention methods, in particular about the animal welfare science behind the clips technology".

"PETA's claims that the clips are 'cruel' are designed to deliberately mislead retailers in order to drive the Australian wool industry out of business," said Don Hamblin, chairman of the Australian Wool and Sheep Industry Taskforce Operations Group.

"PETA's so-called ‘expert’ on the clips, Nedim Buyukmihci, is a self confessed vegan of 21 years and admits he is opposed to the use of anything related to animals and all forms of livestock farming.

"It is of no surprise that he would not support the clips."

Mr Hamblin said the clips were developed in line with the industry's commitment to deliver effective and ethical alternative flystrike prevention methods to mulesing and that they successfully meet those criteria.

"Let us be very clear on this - the use of clips does not constitute mulesing – the clips are proven scientifically and constitute a very effective alternative to prevent flystrike," he said.

A recent study by Professor Paul Hemsworth, director of the Animal Welfare Science Centre at the University of Melbourne, found that the clips technology had only a mild, brief impact on the lambs when applied and that the welfare risks were minor.

"Any retailer decisions to not accept clips as a suitable alternative could be in contravention of good corporate social responsibility, as it would increase the risk of attack by blowflies and death for millions of sheep," Mr Hamblin said.

"The decision to phase out purchasing wool from farms that no longer practice mulesing after 2010 is not a 'victory' for PETA.

"It is part of a long term Agreement between Australian woolgrowers and the international retail industry."

Send to a Friend
Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


You can always tell an article is going to be biased in favor of the AWI the minute the word "extremist" is attached to the animal-friendly side of the argument.

Why even put on airs?

Posted by Hales on 21/04/2008 12:53:48 PM
Because extremists are what they are. Steak for dinner, Hales?
Posted by Brindi on 21/04/2008 8:05:30 PM
The human equivalent of blowfly strike is Screw worm infestation. The female fly lays its eggs just under the skin where the maggots hatch and eat the live flesh of the victim. Severe cases lead to death. If PETA members had such an infestation, I wonder what their attitude would be towards the clips then?? Maybe they just cannot relate to this scenario.
Posted by Trugger on 22/04/2008 6:21:18 AM
If smooth bodied sheep were reared instead of wrinkly ones there would be no need for any painful procedures.
Posted by Keegan on 22/04/2008 6:36:53 AM
Its not suprising that PETA has again failed to notify these companies on the key aspects of the mueling debate. You dont think that's biased Hales? Some blame has to go to the naive companies and individuals such as Hugo Boss and Pink who simply don't get all the facts before they jump on the PETA bandwagon. And the news this morning that PETA is putting millions of dollars into a deadline to produce meat in a laboratory is evidence that PETA's ambition is not to prevent the ethical treatment of animals but to stop the production of commercially produced animal produce entirely. It's a known fact that meat is rich in iron which feeds brain development, something which the people from PETA are obviously lacking.
Posted by Robert on 22/04/2008 8:40:24 AM
Run the wool industry out of town, lets keep digging up fossil fuels to make artificial plastic clothes. This should do wonders for the environment and global warming. Wool is a natural organic fibre that is warm, earthy and environmentally friendly. Yes there may be some issues with animal husbandry but the industry has made a commitment to address these. I feel as though PETA is just persisting in its campaign to justify its existence and to feel important about something. The headline should be "PETA does not give a stuff about the environment, Lets dig up more fossil fuels and fell important about ourselves".
Posted by Ian on 22/04/2008 9:07:08 AM
Well Ian, would the wool industry be looking for alternatives to muelsing if groups such as PETA were not being so vocal? If these producers really cared about welfare, they would have been looking for alternatives many years ago.
Posted by Bernard L Brennan on 22/04/2008 10:07:21 AM
I wonder what sort of clothes Nedim Buyukmihci wears. Not have any animal fibre clothing at all - no leather shoes perhaps. Or only use products that are non animal like plastics, synthetic or maybe plant crops such as cotton - now there's an example of environmentally friendly products - only requires use of chemicals.
Posted by Gordons on 22/04/2008 10:21:22 AM
A lot of wool producers I have talked to do not think clips will work. Of course they are biased and still tail dock with a knife instead of rings and they mules with mulesing shears. As a veterinarian I support their viewpoint. Rings and clips may seem less cruel because they are bloodless - but blood letting kicks in pain relief - crushing injuries do not. I believe babies sometimes have to undergo open heart surgery without anaeathetic for their own good so surgery can be justified! Clips?
Posted by Common Cents on 22/04/2008 2:26:52 PM
Well Bernard, What have you been doing for the last 50 years that mulesing has been occurring in Australia, at least Australian wool growers have been doing something to aleviate pain. No wool grower I know will let any animal suffer long term pain and are very caring toward their stock, If you do not support the eating of red meat at least be honest enough to admit this is the motivation behind all this!!
Posted by Huego on 22/04/2008 9:48:35 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.


3/09/2008 | They say those who can do and those who can't teach, but in the current economic climate for agriculture, it could well be a future of young people who 'can' having to settle for providing services to agribusiness corporations rather than doing it themselves.
Subscription
 
Media-Kit-08-09
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Columnists1
 
Columnists2
 
Rural Bookshop
 
RASF