News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 USDA changes tack on animal traceability 

USDA changes tack on animal traceability

09 Feb, 2010 06:31 AM
The United States Department of Agriculture has announced it will develop "a new, flexible framework for animal disease traceability" and undertake several other actions to further strengthen its disease prevention and response capabilities.

"After concluding our listening tour on the National Animal Identification System in 15 cities across the country, receiving thousands of comments from the public and input from states, tribal nations, industry groups and representatives for small and organic farmers, it is apparent that a new strategy for animal disease traceability is needed," said Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack.

"I've decided to revise the prior policy and offer a new approach to animal disease traceability with changes that respond directly to the feedback we heard."

The framework, announced at the National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA) mid-year meeting, provides the basic tenets of an improved animal disease traceability capability in the US.

The USDA said its efforts will:

  • Only apply to animals moved in interstate commerce;
  • Be administered by the states and tribal nations to provide more flexibility;
  • Encourage the use of lower-cost technology, and
  • Be implemented transparently through federal regulations and the full rulemaking process.

One of USDA's first steps will be to convene a forum with animal health leaders for the states and tribal nations to initiate a dialogue about the possible ways of achieving a flexible, coordinated approach to animal disease traceability.

Additionally, USDA will be revamping the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Animal Health to address specific issues, such as confidentiality and liability.

* More information on USDA's new direction on animal traceability and the steps to improve disease prevention and control is available here at the USDA website.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
USDA had little choice in 'changing tack' after funding was cut off for their previous proposal! The American cattlemen still have some say in their industry, unlike the Australian industry, represented by MLA.
Posted by 'Rob Roy', 10/02/2010 11:43:01 AM, on Queensland Country Life
This is a great win for USA Cattlemen, not for them the half billion dollar white elephant inflicted upon us by out of touch poorly advised State Ag Ministers. RMAC/MLA have a lot to answer for in their relentless push for NLIS using RFID tags.
Posted by Brad Bellnger, 10/02/2010 11:44:28 AM, on The Land
But Brad, if you sacked all the industry experts where would they go? Take the latest Faulty Towers episode, the industry experts say that we don’t need an increase in sale-yard prices because they are delivering to us livestock producers productivity gains. I ran this past my accountant to see if I could get ‘Productivity Gain’ added as a income generated line item. He fell off the chair laughing and finally said that any productivity gain has its own initial start-up cost firstly, and is unquantifiable secondly, given that it can only be measured against the yearly increase in the cost of production, whether statutorily imposed or otherwise and, in any event that my bottom line strongly suggested that the yearly increase in cost of production far exceeds any productivity gained. I said, but the MLA experts said, he said yes, but they are not your accountants are they ??
Posted by The Middle Stump, 10/02/2010 2:06:35 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: One year on from the Black Saturday bushfires, do you think governments are now conducting adequate preventative backburning?

Yes
(5.3%)

No
(89%)

Undecided
(5.7%)

Total Votes: 563
Poll Date: 07 February, 2010

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
Subscriptions
 
Grower
 
Rural Bookshop
 
SJ Facebook
 
SJ Twitter


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...