News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Termination fees hampering water trade 

Termination fees hampering water trade

16/08/2008 4:30:00 AM
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission says high termination fees imposed by water companies on irragators wanting to sell their allocations is hampering the water trade.

As a result the ACCC is seeking submissions on the development of water charge rules for termination fees.

"The termination fees proposed in the position paper will allow water markets to operate more efficiently by removing distortions to trade and by sending signals

to water users about efficient investment in water infrastructure assets," ACCC chairman Graeme Samuel said.

"At the moment some irrigation infrastructure operators impose high termination fees on farmers who elect to sell their water and terminate water delivery rights.

"High termination fees prevent farmers from realising the market value of their water entitlements and deter trade in water."

The ACCC's position paper proposes a cap on termination fees of 11-times annual access fees, falling to eight-times annual access fees by 2015.

In adopting these multiples the ACCC has attempted to balance the legitimate interests of irrigation infrastructure operators and farmers.

"Farmers will benefit through lower termination fees and higher net returns from selling water rights," Mr Samuel said.

"At the same time the proposed multiples will give irrigation operators at least 10 years to assess the impact of trading on their networks and rationalise the network if necessary."

* The position paper is part of an ongoing consultation process. Submissions are to be provided to the ACCC by 5pm Monday 15 September 2008.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
What story is this?? Let me get this right, I sell my house to somebody else and the council will charge me 11 times my rates to do this!

Well...sorry it's farmers we are talking about and State owned "competitive independent" enterprises, not councils and rate payers.

I sell water to you, you buy my water you pay the fees that I was paying, not a cent more not a cent less. Termination fees are just another money grabbing exercise by the State government, via the utilities that they control, from farmers, most of which are selling water out of desperation.

Posted by Peter on 18/08/2008 6:41:59 AM
Termination Fees are designed to pay for the annual infrustructure costs associated with a water entitlement on irrigation schemes.

Termination Fees are only imposed on water licenses that are leaving irrigation schemes. The fees are charged so those left behind on the scheme do not have to carry the extra burden of thoes wishing to leave.

They are vary fair because irrigation schemes were set up in partnerships, and so the water on those schemes was never meant to leave the scheme. Those wishing to leave need to pay the cost they will impose on those they leave behind.

Posted by Tom on 18/08/2008 4:30:10 PM
Termination fees are required on all water leaving an irrigation district, to ensure that the ongoing capital works and infrastructure costs (to be rasied from a diminishing base), do not strangle the farmers who remain within the scheme.

With this in mind, I am concerned with the final paragraph of the story:- "At the same time the proposed multiples will give irrigation operators at least 10 years to assess the impact of trading on their networks and rationalise the network if necessary."

I think history will show that government lead rationalisation is almost never good for farmers?

Posted by Ian on 19/08/2008 7:44:12 AM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Do you support the creation of a 'guest worker' scheme bringing in Pacific Islanders to counter Australian agriculture's labour shortages?

Yes
(69.1%)

No
(25%)

Undecided
(5.9%)

Total Votes: 508
Poll Date: 10/08/2008
26/11/2008 | If we're serious about roo farming, we'll need to start with a breeding program and kangaroo EBVs for marbling and tenderness.
 
Fuel Offer
 
Subscription
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Media-Kit-08-09
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...