News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Expand roo industry to fight climate change: scientists 

Expand roo industry to fight climate change: scientists

8/08/2008 1:54:00 PM
After installing solar panels, buying a hybrid car and turning off the air-conditioner, the climate-conscious Australian is now being asked to eat kangaroo.

The marsupials have the potential to be the Prius of the nation's farmlands.

A scientific paper in the international journal Conservation Letters reports that expanding the kangaroo industry would significantly decrease greenhouse gases.

It has long been known that hard-hoofed sheep and cattle have caused land degradation across the continent.

But only recently have scientists become aware of the damage done by large methane emissions of traditional farm stock.

The paper's lead author, George Wilson, says kangaroos could help cut greenhouse gas emissions.

Dr Wilson is involved with the University of NSW's Future of Australian Terrestrial Ecosystems project and also runs the consultancy company Australian Wildlife Services.

He and his co-author, Melanie Edwards, say a proposal to reduce sheep and cattle numbers on the rangelands by 30pc should be considered.

Sheep and cattle constitute 11pc of Australia's total greenhouse gas emissions.

Kangaroos, however, produce relatively little methane because they are not ruminants.

"Reducing cattle and sheep populations and increasing the kangaroo population on the rangelands to 175 million to produce the same amount of meat by 2020 would lower [greenhouse gas emissions] by 16 megatonnes, or 3pc of Australia's total emissions," the paper says.

The authors argue the increase in kangaroo populations from 34 million to 175 million would be made possible by the decrease in sheep and cattle numbers.

The paper says the carbon dioxide equivalents saved from 2007 to 2020 would be worth $655 million.

"If a national [emissions trading scheme] requires livestock owners to purchase carbon permits to remain with cattle and sheep, landholders would have a stronger incentive to use kangaroo as low-emission meat."

In addition, the authors say, management costs would be lower - less fences or yards, internal or external parasite control, shearing, crutching, branding, dehorning or castrating.

Dr Wilson acknowledges a bigger kangaroo industry is a "hot topic" because it involves big changes in established industries.

Many farmers also regard kangaroos as pests.

Also confronting an expansion of the industry is that many environmentalists and animal rights groups regard kangaroos as an icon and as a native species that should be protected.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Now this idea would really make the grand parade at the Ekka really interesting with the graziers leading out their prize kangaroo breeding stock onto the show ring.

Rodeos would become something else altogether.

I imagine the rodeo calf roping would become joey roping and buck-jumping would really live up to its name with the cowboys, sorry rooboys, riding old man buck roos.

Life would be so much more entertaining if the graziers were to go green as suggested.

Posted by Trugger on 8/08/2008 7:37:03 AM
With all the hype regarding kangaroos, has anybody bothered to boil a kangaroo carcass for pet food. It could be a suprise to see what comes out of the flesh.

I have personally seen worms exit the flesh and float on the water.

This has been enough to put me off eating kangaroo meat for life

Posted by petro on 8/08/2008 9:16:18 AM
I hope this blokes not being paid by the government.
Posted by cliffy on 8/08/2008 2:15:56 PM
Yes please. Wont this be fun. Peta greenies & animal rights types will go spare. This new cause will keep them busey for years. Stop them annoying me.
Posted by THE FARMER on 8/08/2008 6:33:37 PM
This is all rubbish. The kind of rot that a researcher gets up too when he gets on the R and D gravy train and needs more hrs in a light plane. One must have a hobby.
Posted by roo loose in the top paddock on 11/08/2008 7:38:24 AM
Any wildlife carer will tell you that kangaroos are highly stressed animals which cannot be farmed. Unlike sheep and cattle they cannot be rounded up and transported without the animals crashing into fences injuring themselves or dying from stress myopathy. Then one has to consider the amount of "meat" you get off a kangaroo compared to say cattle (which have been selectively bred over time to produce meat for human consumption). The biggest kangaroos (male reds) have an average live weight of 65kg, female reds 25kg and grey kangaroos are about 2/3 their weight. All take at least 7 years to get to their maximum weights. Now take out the bones, skin and other inedible parts and you are left with just about 10kg – 3 kg as prime meat and the rest for “manufactured meat”. Compare this to a 300kg dressed cattle carcass.

If farmers are not going to fence them in, then to harvest them they would more than likely shoot them on the run using a ute or truck, much like they do now. How is this going to save on green house gases or protect the environment as they drive around over a fragile earth?

Have these scientists even considered diseases in wild kangaroos? As a wildlife carer I have had joeys & adult kangaroos die from toxoplasmosis which they pick up from all those wild feral cats out there. It is hard to detect in a kangaroo & passed on to humans if they eat the meat of contaminated animals. Let alone all those other possible diseases that kangaroos may have that nobody knows about because no research has been done on diseases of macropods. Just ask any vet when you take a sick joey to them. What are farmers going to do with female kangaroos with joeys in pouch or at foot? Shoot them also & then raise the joeys to shoot later or let them just die a cruel & horrible death? If they intend to raise them, let me tell you they won't because unlike lambs & calves, they are nervous, time consuming & prone to stress related diseases. They take at least 2 years to raise & the 5 different specialised milk formulae required to raise them are very expensive.

It may all sound good on paper but maybe these scientists should talk to wildlife carers and find out about some of the realities.

Posted by macropodlady on 11/08/2008 7:42:52 AM
less fences? I'm not sure this genius has ever seen a kangaroo! In order to farm something mate, you need to be able to have some control over its location, or is he suggesting that farmers just let roos wander all over the place & shoot them in order to harvest them? To control roos, you need BIGGER fences, & BIGGER yards, not less. Cattle & sheep don't create methane out of thin air, they create it from grass or grain, which breathes in what to grow? oh CO2, what a coincidence!
Posted by THE FARMER 2 on 11/08/2008 7:43:44 AM
Now let's be practical here!! How much edible meat comes from a kangaroo carcass? What happens to Australia's export income from beef which currently supports this country? (50 percent of Australia's jobs are connected to agriculture.) How do we control ticks, lice, worms on the animal? How do we donate ownership - brand or eartag? The mind boggles!! Kangaroos decimate land in dry times as they eat every bit of vegetation including the roots of grass. Do-gooders object to cloven footed animals but protect hard hoofed horses in the national parks of Australia. Horses do far more damage to the land than any number of sheep and cattle. Let's get rid of hypocritical emotive arguments and get real.
Posted by Concerned Northerner on 11/08/2008 7:47:31 AM
"...management costs would be lower - less fences or yards..." I'm pretty sure Dr Wilson has never seen kangaroos except in Taronga Zoo.. last time I checked 8ft fences weren't that cheap mate....
Posted by Webby on 11/08/2008 8:41:52 AM
Regarding the height of fencing needed to confine roos: I would agree, they'd need to be at least 8 feet tall. The following illustrates their ability to jump: We were sitting in the old lite ace van having a cuppa, when across the paddock came a mob of grey kangaroos at a great rate of knots because they were being chased by a bunch of dingos. most of them went around the vehicle but two of them leapt straight over the top of the van and dissapeared into the scrub without so much as breaking their stride. With the cost of ordinary 4 strand barbed wire fencing about $7,000.00 per kl it boggles the mind to think of what it would cost to fence a property for 'roos! I think that I'll stick to our cattle and goats. Barb.
Posted by roo in the stew? on 11/08/2008 10:18:24 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Who is your preferred Leader of the Federal Opposition?

Brendan Nelson
(8%)

Malcolm Turnbull
(22.4%)

Peter Costello
(49.3%)

Julie Bishop
(9.8%)

Other
(10.5%)

Total Votes: 813
Poll Date: 3/08/2008
26/11/2008 | If we're serious about roo farming, we'll need to start with a breeding program and kangaroo EBVs for marbling and tenderness.
 
Fuel Offer
 
Subscription
 
Media-Kit-08-09
 
Horse Deals Australia
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...