News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 GrainCorp profit relies on farmers 

GrainCorp profit relies on farmers

22 Feb, 2012 03:48 AM
EASTERN State's grain business, GrainCorp, is forecasting an another upbeat profit result this year, but is worried about profit pressures hitting its all-important farmer customers.

After securing about 60 per cent of the recent winter grain harvest in its storage and marketing network the company has tipped a net profit after tax of between $165 million and $185m for 2012-13.

The forecast straddles last financial year's record $172m result.

But chairman, Don Taylor warned that despite Australian farmers being ideally placed to take advantage of the "Asian century" food boom, GrainCorp's fortunes were closely tied to the profit incentives of producers which were currently being eroded by slim margins.

Export price penalties associated with a high exchange rate would be further complicated by costs likely to be passed back to farmers when the carbon tax was introduced this year.

"Even though Australian farmers are exempt from the tax it places them at a disadvantage against all our competitors," Mr Taylor said.

"The costs that accumulate through inputs or downstream domestic processing, or along the supply chain, will inevitably be passed back to farmers while their competitors will be selling their grain in overseas markets free from this burden.

"If farmers aren't making money they will have no incentive to increase production.

"As a volume business, GrainCorp's growth and success is tightly linked to the profitability of our farmers."

Mr Taylor told last week's annual general meeting that less regulatory interference in the grain export process would help GrainCorp make grain trading and handling more competitive.

He said unlike coal or iron ore exporters, grain port operators such as GrainCorp, were required to add considerable regulatory compliance costs to their operations which eroded efficiency in a sector that was already highly competitive.

GrainCorp operates eight seaboard terminals, but utilises only about half its 15m tonnes of capacity for its own exports.

It expects its terminals will only handle a total of less than 9.8m tonnes of grain in 2011-12.

Mr Taylor said it was in his company's commercial interest to provide as much access to other exporters as possible to insure its expensive infrastructure was used efficiently.

A "light touch regulatory regime" would benefit all participants in the grain chain, he said.

Managing director, Alison Watkins said the company was attempting to beef up non-grain movements through its ports, including minerals, woodchips and fertiliser, to improve efficiency.

"We recognise harvest volumes won't always be as strong as the past two seasons, so we're looking to diversify our port capabilities to better utilise them in lower grain volume periods," Ms Watkins said.

After another big grain season (but less costly than 2010-11's weather disrupted and delayed harvest) GrainCorp has so far received almost 11m tonnes of crop and expects total deliveries to its country silos will rise towards 12.5m tonnes once the summer crop harvest winds up.

The end result will be about 1.5m to 2.5m tonnes less grain than last trading year, with quality generally better although prices for lower grade grain have been down.

A big six million tonne grain carryover left in store from last year has helped bolster warehousing and port handling earnings, with more exports than normal recorded in the company's first quarter.

"The fundamentals and underlying performance of the business are strong," Ms Watkins said.

She forecast earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) in the vicinity of $350m to $380m.

GrainCorp's nine-month old grain trading office in Germany and its relatively new network of malt processing and trading assets were developing new marketing opportunities.

Although in a sluggish and economically constrained market, the malt business had lifted its EBITDA in recent months with better barley procurement and processing returns.

GrainCorp Malt's global spread of businesses and buying activities was now drawing more support from global brewers who could be supplied in multiple markets.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Don Taylor played a key role in the removal of the single desk legislation which gave growers equity in the market place and gave them leverage against logistics providers such as Graincorp.
Posted by Jock Munro, 22/02/2012 8:22:26 AM
If Don Taylor played a key role in deregulation he should be commended for the work he has done to give growers choice in the marketplace and encourage outside interests to invest in the logistics chain.
Posted by blahblah, 22/02/2012 10:30:26 AM
Hale. Don Taylor.
Posted by jock hoskinson, 22/02/2012 7:04:01 PM
Where is the new investment blah blah and do you really think that Don taylor would want supply chain competition?

Do you really believe that there would be much competition in a duopoly?

Posted by Jock Munro, 22/02/2012 7:51:55 PM
Cargill bought grainflow - do you think they will not invest money in a 800m$ asset - do you think they will let it rot into the ground

The same story with CBH, Emerald, the small co-op's, viterra..................

Posted by blahblah, 23/02/2012 11:00:59 AM
Graincorp has invested very little in its receival sites.

Our National Pool manager AWB Ltd invested in state of the art sites with an aim to lower grower costs and perhaps encourage further investment.

Graincorp chose not too match any of those sites.

Unfortuneately, in what can only be desrcibed as a travesty, Cargill have ended up with what belonged to growers.

Posted by Jock Munro, 23/02/2012 8:08:36 PM
Graincorp has invested very little in its receival sites.

Our National Pool manager AWB Ltd invested in state of the art sites with an aim to lower grower costs and perhaps encourage further investment.

Graincorp chose not too match any of those sites.

Unfortuneately, in what can only be desrcibed as a travesty, Cargill have ended up with what belonged to growers.

Posted by Jock Munro, 23/02/2012 8:08:59 PM
Jock - Do you think that companies who invest multiple hundreds of millions on buying storage capacity will allow them to rot away?

Does that make commercial sense?

Posted by blahblah, 24/02/2012 5:58:21 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
26 January, 2012
10 February, 2012
16 February, 2012
POLL
Q: Who is your preferred Prime Minister?

Julia Gillard
(5.5%)

Kevin Rudd
(7.8%)

Tony Abbott
(30.9%)

Malcolm Turnbull
(25.2%)

Warren Truss
(2.3%)

Barnaby Joyce
(7.4%)

Bob Katter
(7.2%)

Yourself
(9.3%)

Other
(4.4%)

Total Votes: 1371
Poll Date: 20 February, 2012

Most popular articles




Stock Journal







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...