Opinion 
 Blogs 
 The week observed  
 Nats-Libs merger a question of identity 

Nats-Libs merger a question of identity

This week's Labor legislation dismantling the single desk export marketing arrangements for wheat can be viewed from any number of angles: a broken election promise, the rejection of the will of the majority, and even another step towards dismantling of The Nationals.

While the latter may seem a long bow to draw from a single piece of legislation, it is true that the single desk was one of the last pillars of Nationals policy which separated it from both the Liberals and Labor.

Having embraced free trade, rolled over on the sale of Telstra against the will of its constituency, and now having lost the argument to maintain the single desk, The Nationals now have few points of difference left in the political market place.

Which begs the question, if Nationals Leader Warren Truss is serious about the option of splitting the Coalition and going it alone - as he again suggested this week - what would separate The Nationals identity from the other parties in opposition?

Former Leader Mark Vaile went to the last election trying to separate The Nationals from the Liberals by branding the Nats as the party for the seven million regional Australians - but when it came to the crunch, voters chose Labor.

Identity and demographic change have together been responsible for the decline in Nationals' representation in the Federal Parliament.

The other alternative, of course, is the much-publicised option of merging with the Liberals to form a single non-Labor conservative party, which looks likely to happen in Queensland.

In the same way as the ideological gap has narrowed between Labor and Liberal, it has all but disappeared between The Nationals and their coalition partners.

And even if there were differences of opinion within a new party, Liberal and National party rules - unlike the Labor party - allow members to cross the floor, a la Senators Gary Humphries or Barnaby Joyce, and voice dissent without consequence. Thus, a rump of ex-Nationals members could operate within any new federal conservative party in the same way they operate currently in the joint Coalition party room.

But while The Nationals and Liberals in NSW are very close, the situation in each state is very different - in South Australia the sole Nationals MP is in Coalition with the Labor State Government.

Either all states will have to work at their own pace, or federal party leaders will have to impose a merger from the top - a messy business which would not be well received in all quarters.

The path forward is riddled with difficulties for Warren Truss, and the Liberals know they have time and demography on their side if he dallies too long.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The dismantling of the single desk was a broken promise by the Liberals, but not by Labor. Labor proposed to dismantle the single desk last year during the election campaign, and were supported in this decision by the Liberal Wilson Tuckey.

It is the Liberals that changed their position this week, when during the election campaign the coalition said they would retain the single desk. Obviously the Liberals just said that for the election, but didn't actually mean it. At least the Nationals meant what they said.

Posted by ShowsOn on 7/06/2008 1:54:38 PM
There is little hope left for Australian farmers to continue traditional farming as this country has known it. Increasingly high costs and continuing low returns are forcing farming families to give up and leave the land.

We need to take our last chance to survive and form a Farmers Union & consider withholding supply.

Posted by Ian Shearing on 8/06/2008 5:55:06 AM
The single-desk issue was bungled years ago from which there could be no recovery. It shows unfortunately that the Nats as they stand have no purpose. In any case they should NOT merge with Liberals (most of the latter don't know what they stand for either!).

The Nats should revert to being the Country Party in fact and in name. The name Nationals never carried any credibility anyway.

Posted by Observer on 10/06/2008 7:27:53 AM
The week observed
Observations of each week's major rural news and what they mean for rural Australia.

Q: How do rate the performance of the Rudd Government after its first six months in office?

Excellent
(8.4%)

Good
(10.5%)

Average
(16.2%)

Poor
(30.9%)

Terrible
(33.9%)

Total Votes: 722
Poll Date: 1/06/2008

10:41 AM ACST | Wool's ugly politics, seen at it's worst in recent months, will not change with new faces at Australian Wool Innovation; the problem is deeply rooted in the very structure of the body.
Subscription
 
Media-Kit-08-09
 
Agrimaster
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Rural Bookshop
 
RASF
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...